MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286457271 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.915575

Plasma Apolipoproteins Predicting the Occurrence and Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2022· article· en· W4286457271 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xinyuan Zhang, Yao Nie, Zhizhong Gong, Meidong Zhu, Bingjie Qiu, Qiyun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Endocrinology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineDiabetes mellitusBody mass indexGlycated hemoglobinDiabetic retinopathyType 2 Diabetes MellitusApolipoprotein BLipid profileCholesterolType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Apolipoproteins are amphipathic molecules and the major components of plasma lipoproteins. This study aims to investigate the effects of dysregulated apolipoprotein (apo) profiles and their ratios on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) further to test the hypothesis that altered serum level of apolipoproteins is strong biomarkers for DR. Research Design and Methods This case-control study consists of 157 patients with T2DM including DM without DR, non-proliferative DR (NPDR), and proliferative DR (PDR). Fifty-eight age- and sex-matched healthy subjects were enrolled as normal controls. Blood biochemistry profile including serum levels of glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TG), high and low-density lipoprotein (HDL-C and LDL-C)] was estimated. Apolipoproteins (apos, A-I, A-II, B, C-II, C-III, and E) was evaluated by protein chips (Luminex technology). Apolipoprotein ratios and arteriosclerosis-associated plasma indices were calculated. The Kruskal–Wallis test, independent sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, and multivariate regression analysis were performed to investigate the association of serum lipid biomarkers and the DR severity. Results Serum level of apoA-I was negatively correlated with TC-(HDL-C)/HDL-C ( p < 0.001), fasting glucose ( p < 0.001), HbA1c ( p < 0.001), and ( p <0.001), while apoE, apoC-II/apoC-III, apoA-II/apoA-I were positively correlated with above traditional biomarkers ( p < 0.001). Single variable logistic analysis results showed that body mass index (BMI) ( p = 0.023), DM duration ( p < 0.001), apoE ( p < 0.001), apoC-II/apo C-III ( p < 0.001), apoE/apoC-II ( p < 0.001), atherogenic index ( p = 0.013), fasting glucose ( p < 0.001), HbA1c ( p < 0.001), LPA ( p = 0.001), and LDL-C/HDL-C ( p = 0.031) were risk factors for the occurrence and severity of DR. Multivariate logistic regression mode showed that apoC-II/apoC-III and apoB/non–HDL-C ( p < 0.001) as well as apoE/apoC-II ( p = 0.001) were the independent risk factors for the occurrence and severity of DR—apopA-I and apoA-II are protective factors for DR—after controlling for the duration of DM, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and LPA. Conclusions apoE, apoC-II/apoC-III, apoE/apoC-II, and apoB/non–HDL-C could be used as novel biomarkers for occurrence and severity of DR, whereas apoA-I and apoA-II resulted as protective factors for DR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in EndocrinologySame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207