Altitudinal Patterns in Adaptive Evolution of Genome Size and Inter-Genome Hybridization Between Three Elymus Species From the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genome size variation and hybridization occur frequently within or between plant species under diverse environmental conditions, which enrich species diversification and drive the evolutionary process. Elymus L. is the largest genus in Triticeae with five recognized basic genomes (St, H, P, W, and Y). However, the data on population cytogenetics of Elymus species are sparse, especially whether genome hybridization and chromosomal structure can be affected by altitude are still unknown. In order to explore the relationship between genome sizes, we studied interspecific hybridization and altitude of Elymus species at population genetic and cytological levels. Twenty-seven populations at nine different altitudes (2,800–4,300 m) of three Elymus species, namely, hexaploid E. nutans (StHY, 2n = 6x = 42), tetraploid E. burchan-buddae (StY, 2n = 4x = 28), and E. sibiricus (StH, 2n = 4x = 28), were sampled from the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP) to estimate whether intraspecific variation could affect the genomic relationships by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), and quantify the genome size of Elymus among different altitude ecological groups by flow cytometry. The genome size of E. nutans, E. burchan-buddae , and E. sibiricus varied from 12.38 to 22.33, 8.81 to 18.93, and 11.46 to 20.96 pg/2C with the averages of 19.59, 12.39, and 16.85 pg/2C, respectively. The curve regression analysis revealed a strong correlation between altitude and nuclear DNA content in three Elymus species. In addition, the chromosomes of the St and Y genomes demonstrated higher polymorphism than that of the H genome. Larger genome size variations occurred in the mid-altitude populations (3,900–4,300 m) compared with other-altitude populations, suggesting a notable altitudinal pattern in genome size variation, which shaped genome evolution by altitude. This result supports our former hypothesis that genetic richness center at medium altitude is useful and valuable for species adaptation to highland environmental conditions, germplasm utilization, and conservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".