MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Rise of Stakeholder Governance and Diversity, and Consequences on Executive and Board Careers

2022· article· en· W4286666733 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle K. Lee, Michael Useem, Shelby Gai, Andre Havrylyshyn, Seok-Hyun Hwang, Donald J. Schepker, Wei Shi, Edward J. Zajac

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStakeholderCorporate governanceDiversity (politics)AccountabilityShareholderPublic relationsPolitical scienceCorporate social responsibilityValue (mathematics)Corporate communicationDismissalSociologyManagementLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of corporate leaders has changed vastly in the past few decades. In particular, the past decade has been marked by the rise of stakeholder pressures from activist shareholders looking to extract shareholder value, social activists seeking social participation, and increasing consumer and media attention on corporate leaders. As societal issues have gained recognition and stakeholders are increasingly powerful in governance, organizations and their leaders are held to a level of accountability never seen before in new areas including stakeholder governance and diversity. Corporate leaders are more diverse than they have been in the past, expected to be attune to stakeholder pressures, and presumably more capable of promoting a social agenda within their own organizations. The symposium seeks to understand how increasing pressures from stakeholders, as well as ensuing calls for diversity in the business elite have affected organizational decisions concerning the careers of corporate leaders. The studies explore the interplay of these newer societal pressures on organizations and uncover the degree of accountability imposed on their corporate leaders. How symbolic capital reduces negative spillovers for corporate directors Presenter: Seok-Hyun (Stephen) Hwang; Hong Kong Baptist U. Presenter: Edward J. Zajac; Northwestern U. How Decision Makers’ career histories impact the Gender diversity of CEO successor candidate pool Presenter: Andre Havrylyshyn; Darla Moore School of Business, U. of South Carolina Presenter: Donald Joseph Schepker; U. of South Carolina Regulatory violations of stakeholder rights and verbal displays of CEO value: Effects on dismissal Presenter: Daniel Zyung; Southern Methodist U. Presenter: Wei Shi; U. of Miami Class-based performance? How social class background influences performance and CEO career outcomes Presenter: Michelle K. Lee; Smith School of Business, Queen's U. Presenter: Shelby Gai; Michigan State U.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicGender Diversity and InequalityFrench-language works237,207