MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286681556 · doi:10.53810/jt.v22i2.429

UPAYA PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH NON DOMESTIK DENGAN MENINGKATKAN FUNGSI KONTROL

2022· article· id· W4286681556 on OpenAlex
SUSATYO ADHI, EDDY POERWODIHARDJO

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTeodolita Media Komunkasi Ilmiah di Bidang teknik · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWaste Management and Recycling
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstrak
 Sampah adalah konsep protesis manusia, pada proses-proses alam nir terdapat sampah, yg terdapat hanya produk-produk yg tidak bergerak. Ada beberapa fase materi sampah berupa padat, cair, atau gas. Pelapasan pada fase kedua atau disebut terakhir, terutama gas, sampah bisa dikatakan menjadi emisi. Emisi biasa dikaitkan dengan polusi
 Didalam kehidupan manusia, sampah pada jumlah besar berdasarkan kegiatan industri (dikenal pula menggunakan sebutan limbah), contohnya pertambangan, manufaktur, & konsumsi. Hampir seluruh produk industri akan sebagai sampah dalam suatu waktu, menggunakan jumlah sampah yg kira-kira seperti menggunakan jumlah konsumsi.
 Cara pengendalian sampah yg paling sederhana merupakan menggunakan menumbuhkan pencerahan berdasarkan pada diri masing-masing individu juga forum buat nir menghambat lingkungan menggunakan sampah. Selain itu diharapkan pula kontrol sosial budaya warga membuat lebih menghargai lingkungan, walau kadang juga dihadapkan dalam mitos tertentu.
 Kata kunci: sampah , masyarakat , lingkungan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it