MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

E-065 Experience with neuroform atlas stenting as rescue endovascular treatment after failed mechanical thrombectomy secondary to intracranial atherosclerosis

2022· article· en· W4286700693 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Orgest Lajthia, E. Almallouhi, K. Kicielinski, J Lena, A Spiotta, S Al Kasab

Bibliographic record

VenueSNIS 19th annual meeting electronic poster abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStenosisStentRevascularizationStroke (engine)OcclusionSingle CenterEndovascular treatmentSurgeryRadiologyInternal medicineAneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Patients with emergent large vessel occlusion secondary to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS-ELVO) who fail mechanical thrombectomy (MT) pose a treatment challenge. The aim of this study is to report our single center experience using the Neuroform Atlas stent as a potential rescue modality. Methods Data was analyzed from a prospectively maintained database at a Comprehensive Stroke Center between January 2019 and September 2021 on all ICAS-ELVO patients who underwent MT and required rescue stenting with the Neuroform Atlas. We systematically gathered demographic, clinical, procedural and functional characteristics on patients presenting with ELVO within 24 hours of last known normal. The primary outcome was the rate of revascularization following stenting. Results 26 patients met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 56.5 years old, 34.6% of whom were female. On presentation the median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 11 and media Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 9. MT was performed using A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) in all patients. Following Neuroform Atlas stent placement, 3 patients (11.5%) had moderate in stent stenosis while severe stenosis was encountered in 4 patients (15.4%). The rate of successful revascularization (TICI IIB-III) was identified in 92.3% of the patients. On follow up vascular images, re-occlusion occurred in 2 patients (7.7%) and symptomatic hemorrhage was encountered in 3 patients (11.5%). Excellent outcome at 90 days (mRS 0–2) was achieved in 13/26 (50%) of patients. Conclusions Our series provides preliminary safety and efficacy data regarding the use of the Neuroform Atlas stent as a rescue modality in ICAS-ELVO cases. Disclosures O. Lajthia: None. E. Almallouhi: None. K. Kicielinski: None. J. Lena: None. A. Spiotta: None. S. Al Kasab: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSNIS 19th annual meeting electronic poster abstractsSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207