MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

E-004 Modeling the effect of hemodynamics on endothelial rna expression in cerebral aneurysms after endovascular flow diversion

2022· article· en· W4286701410 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guilherme Barros, E Federico, P Fillingham, Jiajie Xue, N Kaneko, Yihao Zheng, M Levitt

Bibliographic record

VenueSNIS 19th annual meeting electronic poster abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAneurysmPulsatile flowHemodynamicsOcclusionMedicineEmbolizationInternal carotid arteryThrombosisRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Flow diverting stents (FDS) are a valuable endovascular option to treat unruptured cerebral aneurysms, with a single endoluminal device in the parent vessel ultimately promoting thrombosis and occlusion of the aneurysm sac. Flow diversion has yielded promising long-term aneurysm occlusion data; however, retreatment is required in up to 8% by 2 years. Questions remain about the biologic responses behind treatment successes and failures. The goal of this study is to understand how changes in hemodynamic flow after FDS placement affect aneurysmal endothelial RNA expression associated with treatment success or failure. <h3>Methods</h3> An in vitro, patient-specific three-dimensional aneurysm model with pre- and post-FDS treatment conditions was created to quantify the endothelial response specific to hemodynamic changes within the aneurysm dome seen on computational flow dynamic (CFD) simulations. Each model was seeded with human carotid endothelial cells and then subjected to pulsatile flow with patient-specific mean blood flow velocity for 24 hours (Figure 1). RNA was isolated from aneurysm dome, along with proximal and distal parent vessels serving as internal controls for each patient. The same experiments are performed both before and after FDS placement using commercially available FDS (Pipeline Embolization Device). <h3>Results</h3> Six unique patients with intracranial internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with FDS were included, of which three had successful treatments with complete occlusion, while three had treatment failure with persistent aneurysm filling requiring retreatment. Experiments are currently ongoing, with four of six pre-treatment models completed endothelial cell seeding, exposure to flow, and RNA isolation. Post-treatment models with implanted FDS will then undergo the same experiment. We then will use the colocalized CFD and RNA expression data to identify patterns consistent with treatment outcomes. Bulk RNA sequencing will be completed on each sample. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Direct study of the vascular endothelial response to changes in hemodynamic stress experienced in cerebral aneurysms after FDS has not yet been performed. This study could address the knowledge gap regarding the mechanisms of treatment outcome and angiographic occlusion, to ultimately improve endovascular treatments of cerebral aneurysms. <h3>Disclosures</h3> <b>G. Barros:</b> None. <b>E. Federico:</b> None. <b>P. Fillingham:</b> None. <b>J. Xue:</b> None. <b>N. Kaneko:</b> None. <b>Y. Zheng:</b> None. <b>M. Levitt:</b> 1; C; Stryker, Medtronic. 2; C; Medtronic, Metis Innovative. 4; C; Synchron, Cerebrotech, Proprio, Hyperion Surgical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSNIS 19th annual meeting electronic poster abstractsSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207