O-058 Preclinical validation of the ReSolv<sup>TM</sup> stent: a primarily bioresorbable flow diverter for aneurysm treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction/Purpose Existing metal flow-diverting stents are limited in their use mainly for sidewall aneurysms and restrict re-treatment options should the aneurysm fail to occlude. In this study, we sought to pre-clinically validate a novel hybrid polymer-metal flow-diverting stent (‘ReSolvTM’) in terms of in vivo safety and efficacy, deployment in multiple aneurysm types, and an ability to employ adjunctive or re-treatment techniques typically unavailable for metal stents. Materials and Methods The ReSolvTM stent was deployed in 30 rabbit models, including 24 aortas (with up to 18 months of follow-up) and 6 elastase-induced saccular aneurysms (with at least 6 months of follow-up). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to characterize neointima formation while angiography was used to evaluate parent vessel/jailed side branch patency, as well as aneurysm occlusion at follow-up time points. Patient-specific models of ophthalmic, posterior communicating, cavernous, and basilar tip aneurysms were used to study deployment characteristics, wall apposition (by 3D AngioCT), and mesh crossability of the BRS. Results In animal models, OCT showed smooth neointima formation over the stent in as early as 7 days, and all parent vessels (30/30) and angiographically visible jailed side branches (58/58) were patent at follow-up. O’Kelly-Marotta scores at a mean of 7.5 months indicated aneurysm occlusion or near-occlusion in 5/6 (83%) animals. The stent was successfully deployed using the push-pull technique in patient-specific aneurysm models with good wall apposition, and with an ability to shape the stent to improve neck coverage of bifurcation aneurysms. Microcatheter access to the aneurysm could be obtained across the mesh of the stent for coiling after flow diversion. Conclusions The ReSolvTM stent demonstrates safety and effectiveness as a stand-alone flow diverter in animal models. The device is uniquely versatile in its potential ability to treat both sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms, and by permitting microcatheter access across the mesh for adjunctive coiling or future re-treatment, thereby expanding therapeutic strategies in the treatment of brain aneurysms. Disclosures E. Rezabeigi: 5; C; Fluid Biomed. M. Eesa: 4; C; Fluid Biomed. J. Wong: 4; C; Fluid Biomed. A. Mitha: 1; C; Stryker Neurovascular, Fluid Biomed. 2; C; Cerus Endovascular. 4; C; Fluid Biomed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".