MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286714040

Secondary analysis of qualitative data in defence studies: opportunities and challenges

2021· book-chapter· en· W4286714040 on OpenAlexaff
Delphine Deschaux-Dutard, Laurent Borzillo

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicData Analysis and Archiving
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative analysisQualitative researchSociologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International audience

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.583
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.641
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5830.641
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.004
Bibliometrics0.0160.026
Science and technology studies0.0130.028
Scholarly communication0.0310.026
Open science0.0100.020
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.238
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicData Analysis and ArchivingFrench-language works237,207