Inductive effect of <scp>MXene</scp> membrane influenced by β‐ <scp>cyclodextrin</scp> intercalation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Two‐dimensional nanomaterials could be potentially applied in the field of brain–computer interface due to their significant inductive effect during ion permeation. In order to tune the inductive signal through the microstructure, a membrane based on MXene‐grafted β‐cyclodextrin (β‐CD) was prepared, and its electrochemical performance was recorded. The experimental results confirmed that β‐CD has been successfully intercalated into the gallery between the MXene sheets, and the intercalation induced a weaker inductive effect of MXene in the ion diffusion process. Moreover, the results indicated that easier ion diffusion through the membrane could result in weaker inductance. Besides, the experimental results were roughly analyzed by the back‐propagation (BP) neural network to compare the contribution of the influence factors. The results suggested that tunable inductance can be achieved by constructing a certain interlay spacing of MXene, which could be potentially used to design microsized inductors in biological applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".