Approche techno-pragmatique des projections domestiques à la lanterne magique : les « vues sur verre en bande » de la maison Lapierre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La maison française Lapierre produit au XIXe siècle des lanternes jouets, accompagnées de séries de plaques destinées notamment aux enfants, et dont la projection a lieu dans le cercle familial - qu'on pense à la projection par la grand-tante du narrateur de La Recherche.Comment les images guident-elles la manipulation des plaques Lapierre par les projectionnistes amateurs ? Et quels effets de sens la manipulation des plaques peut-elle créer ?En croisant des connaissances approfondies sur la technique des lanternes à une approche pragmatique des séries de plaque, je montrerai, par l'analyse de plusieurs exemples (la chanson Cadet Rousselle, le récit de Geneviève de Brabant), que les Lapierre ont une conscience profonde des possibilités narratives et expressives de leur médium, qui se déploie en termes de cadrage, de mouvement de l'image, ou encore de répartition des images entre les différentes plaques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".