Identification of Homozygous Regions With Adverse Effects on the Five Economic Traits of Duroc Pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Runs of homozygosity (ROH) are widely used to estimate genomic inbreeding, which is linked to inbreeding depression on phenotypes. However, the adverse effects of specific homozygous regions on phenotypic characteristics are rarely studied in livestock. In this study, the 50 K SNP data of 3,770 S21 Duroc (American origin) and 2,096 S22 Duroc (Canadian origin) pigs were used to investigate the harmful ROH regions on five economic traits. The results showed that the two Duroc lines had different numbers and distributions of unfavorable ROHs, which may be related to the different selection directions and intensities between the two lines. A total of 114 and 58 ROH segments were found with significant adverse effects on the economic traits of S21 and S22 pigs, respectively. Serval pleiotropic ROHs were detected to reduce two or multiple phenotypic performances in two Duroc populations. Candidate genes in these shared regions were mainly related to growth, fertility, immunity, and fat deposition. We also observed that some ROH genotypes may cause opposite effects on different traits. This study not only enhances our understanding of the adverse effects of ROH on phenotypes, but also indicates that ROH information could be incorporated into breeding programs to estimate and control the detrimental effects of homozygous regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".