Comparison of clinical efficacy of neddle knife at acupoints selected from recent regions along meridians and according to anatomical structures in treating early and middle stage knee osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To stimulate tenderness points around knee joint in two metholds-corresponding \nacupoints selected from recent regions along meridians and anatomical structures,to \ncompare the clinical efficacy of neddle knife of to cure early and middle stage knee \nosteoarthritis. Method: 70 patients were randomly (Random Number Tables)divided \ninto test group(acupoints selected from recent regions along meridians,n=35)and control \ngroup(anatomical structures,n=35) ,who were diagnosed as knee osteoarthritis.Observe the \nVAS(visual analogue scale), Lysholm,WOMAC(the Western Ontario and McMaster Unive \nrsities Osteoarthritis Index) and ROM(rang of motion) between two groups in first week,first \nmonth, third month after treatment.Recording the degree of improvement of knee joint’s pain, \ndysfunction and symptoms of osteoarthritis and rang of motion. Results: Within groups, the \nVAS, Lysholm, WOMAC and ROM were obviously different from pre-therapy scores in the \nthird, sixth and twelfth week post-therapy(P＜0.05).Between groups no significant difference \nwere observed in the third week post-therapy about VAS, Lysholm ,WOMAC scores(P＞0.05). \nHowever, there were differences in the sixth, twelfth weeks post-therapy (P＜0.05);compared \nwith control group, the ROM of test group were difference in the third, sixth, twelfth weeks \npost-therapy(P＜0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of stimulating corresponding \nacupoints tenderness points selected from recent regions along meridians to treat early and \nmiddle stage knee osteoarthritis was superior to anatomical structures, which can effectively \nrelieve pain, dysfunction,symptoms of osteoarthritis of knee joint and rang of motion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".