MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4287026359 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.05248

Public Key Reinforced Blockchain Platform for Fog-IoT Network System\n Administration

2021· preprint· W4287026359 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Jayson Baucas, Petros Spachos, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkEncryptionHandshakeComputer securityKey (lock)Network packetServer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of embedded devices that connect to a wireless network has been\ngrowing for the past decade. This interaction creates a network of Internet of\nThings (IoT) devices where data travel continuously. With the increase of\ndevices and the need for the network to extend via fog computing, we have\nfog-based IoT networks. However, with more endpoints introduced to it, the\nnetwork becomes open to malicious attackers. This work attempts to protect\nfog-based IoT networks by creating a platform that secures the endpoints\nthrough public-key encryption. The servers are allowed to mask the data packets\nshared within the network. To be able to track all of the encryption processes,\nwe incorporated the use of permissioned blockchains. This technology completes\nthe security layer by providing an immutable and automated data structure to\nfunction as a hyper ledger for the network. Each data transaction incorporates\na handshake mechanism with the use of a public key pair. This design guarantees\nthat only devices that have proper access through the keys can use the network.\nHence, management is made convenient and secure. The implementation of this\nplatform is through a wireless server-client architecture to simulate the data\ntransactions between devices. The conducted qualitative tests provide an\nin-depth feasibility investigation on the network's levels of security. The\nresults show the validity of the design as a means of fortifying the network\nagainst endpoint attacks.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)→Same topicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security→French-language works237,207→