MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287115978 · doi:10.3390/universe9050222

Octonion Internal Space Algebra for the Standard Model

2023· article· en· W4287115978 on OpenAlexaff
Иван Тодоров

Bibliographic record

VenueUniverse · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsClifford algebraSpinorOmegaParticle physicsMathematical physicsCombinatoricsQuantum mechanicsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper surveys recent progress in our search for an appropriate internal space algebra for the standard model (SM) of particle physics. After a brief review of the existing approaches, we start with the Clifford algebras involving operators of left multiplication by octonions. A central role is played by a distinguished complex structure that implements the splitting of the octonions O=C⊕C3, which reflect the lepton-quark symmetry. Such a complex structure on the 32-dimensional space S of Cℓ10 Majorana spinors is generated by the Cℓ6(⊂Cℓ10) volume form, ω6=γ1⋯γ6, and is left invariant by the Pati–Salam subgroup of Spin(10), GPS=Spin(4)×Spin(6)/Z2. While the Spin(10) invariant volume form ω10=γ1…γ10 of Cℓ10 is known to split S on a complex basis into left and right chiral (semi)spinors, P=12(1−iω6) is interpreted as the projector on the 16-dimensional particle subspace (which annihilates the antiparticles).The standard model gauge group appears as the subgroup of GPS that preserves the sterile neutrino (which is identified with the Fock vacuum). The Z2-graded internal space algebra A is then included in the projected tensor product A⊂PCℓ10P=Cℓ4⊗Cℓ60. The Higgs field appears as the scalar term of a superconnection, an element of the odd part Cℓ41 of the first factor. The fact that the projection of Cℓ10 only involves the even part Cℓ60 of the second factor guarantees that the color symmetry remains unbroken. As an application, we express the ratio mHmW of the Higgs to the W boson masses in terms of the cosine of the theoretical Weinberg angle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniverseSame topicAlgebraic and Geometric AnalysisFrench-language works237,207