MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287204628 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09920

GPS-denied Navigation: Attitude, Position, Linear Velocity, and Gravity\n Estimation with Nonlinear Stochastic Observer

2021· preprint· en· W4287204628 on OpenAlexaff
Hashim A. Hashim

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitQuaternionControl theory (sociology)GPS/INSNonlinear systemComputer sciencePosition (finance)Global Positioning SystemKalman filterObserver (physics)Stochastic differential equationComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsAssisted GPSApplied mathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Successful navigation of a rigid-body traveling with six degrees of freedom\n(6 DoF) requires accurate estimation of attitude , position, and linear\nvelocity. The true navigation dynamics are highly nonlinear and are modeled on\nthe matrix Lie group of SE2(3). This paper presents novel geometric nonlinear\ncontinuous stochastic navigation observers on SE2(3) capturing the true\nnonlinearity of the problem. The proposed observers combines IMU and landmark\nmeasurements. It efficiently handles the IMU measurement noise. The proposed\nobservers are guaranteed to be almost semi-globally uniformly ultimately\nbounded in the mean square. Quaternion representation is provided. A real-world\nquadrotor measurement dataset is used to validate the effectiveness of the\nproposed observers in its discrete form. Keywords: Inertial navigation,\nstochastic system, Brownian motion process, stochastic filter algorithm,\nstochastic differential equation, Lie group, SE(3), SO(3), pose estimator,\nposition, attitude, feature measurement, inertial measurement unit, IMU.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207