New Insights into the Bonding Properties of [Ag <sub>25</sub> (SR) <sub>18</sub> ] <sup>−</sup> Nanoclusters from X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atomically precise metal nanoclusters have attracted significant interest due to their molecule-like properties. [Ag 25 (SR) 18 ] − is one of the Ag nanoclusters having a unique structure similar to its Au counterpart but different from most other Ag nanoclusters. In this study, a new five-shell fitting method was developed to analyze the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra of [Ag 25 (SR) 18 ] − to provide more insights into its bonding properties. This new method was successfully applied to compare the bond lengths as the temperature changed from 300 to 90 K. Interestingly, the metal core of [Ag 25 (SR) 18 ] − showed negative thermal expansion behavior that was not observed for Au 25 (SR) 18 . These unique bonding properties of [Ag 25 (SR) 18 ] − could be related to the Ag 4 tetrahedral units found in the metal core, which were absent in Au 25 (SR) 18 . These new findings about its bonding properties can provide a better understanding of the structure–property relationship of [Ag 25 (SR) 18 ] − . This new EXAFS analysis method could be applied to gain insights into the bonding properties of other metal nanoclusters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".