MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Joseph Justus Scaliger

2022· reference-entry· en· W4287831604 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2022
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilologyScholarshipTextual criticismHumanismClassicsHebrewLiteratureArtHistoryPhilosophyNew TestamentTheologySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joseph Justus Scaliger (b. 1540–d. 1609) is regarded as one of the most important scholars of Europe around 1600. His scholarship is primarily devoted to the philology of texts ranging from preclassical Rome to the Byzantine period, including the Bible. Building on the work of Italian and French humanists, Scaliger increased the empirical character of textual criticism by assessing the materiality of the documentary evidence and by sharpening the principles to establish the interdependence of manuscripts in the chain of transmission of ancient Greek and Roman authors, on the one hand, and of the Bible, on the other hand. Moreover, he is often billed as the founding father of comparative chronology on account of his two editions of Manilius (1579, 1599), his De emendatione temporum (1583, 1598) on calendar reform, and the Thesaurus temporum (1606). Scaliger was also famed as a pioneer among Europeans in the study of eastern languages such as Arabic, Chaldaic (Aramaic), Aethiopic, and Persian. As an accomplished Christian Hebraist, he took an interest in Rabbinic scholarship and studied the Hebrew Bible, the Greek New Testament, and the Septuagint as well as versions in other languages. Scaliger himself never published a coherent study of his biblical observations and his polyhistorical antiquarian knowledge, which remained scattered across his published works, letters, and Table Talk. He exercised a lasting influence on the Leiden School of classical, biblical, and oriental historico-critical philology and antiquarianism through such scholars as Janus Gruter, Hugo Grotius, Daniel Heinsius, Gerardus Vossius, Thomas Erpenius, Jacob Golius, Constantine l’Empereur, Louis de Dieu, Claude Saumaise, and Isaac Vossius. Together with his friend and closest correspondent, Isaac Casaubon, he informed a variety of debates regarding ancient philosophy and modern religion in 17th-century England. Scaliger, the son of the philosopher, medical scholar, and poetical theorist Julius Caesar Scaliger, was born in Agen, France, and studied in Paris. After his conversion to Calvinism (1563), he entered a wandering life in the services of a French nobleman who fought on the side of the Catholic king. In 1593, he moved to Leiden University, where he lived until his death, at times embroiled in polemics with Catholic scholars who mocked his vain claim to a noble pedigree. He corresponded widely with German, French, Flemish, and Dutch scholars. Part of his private oriental collection was posthumously integrated into the collections of the university library, and, in the twenty-first century, the university named a research institute after him.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and Reformation→Same topicReformation and Early Modern Christianity→French-language works237,207→