MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287833015 · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c02896

Rethinking Subthreshold Effects in Regulatory Chemical Risk Assessments

2022· article· en· W4287833015 on OpenAlexaff
Evgenios Agathokleous, ‪Damià Barceló, Michael Aschner, Ricardo Antunes Azevedo, Prosun Bhattacharya, David Costantini, G. Christopher Cutler, Alessandra De Marco, Anca Oana Docea, José G. Dórea, Stephen O. Duke, Thomas Efferth, Despo Fatta‐Kassinos, Vasileios Fotopoulos, Antonio Ginebreda, R. N. C. Guedes, A. Wallace Hayes, Ivo Iavicoli, Olga‐Ioanna Kalantzi, Takayoshi Koike, Demetrios Kouretas, Manish Kumar, José E. Manautou, Michael N. Moore, Elena Paoletti, Josep Peñuelas, Yolanda Picó, Rüssel J. Reiter, Ramin Rezaee, Jörg Rinklebe, Teresa Rocha‐Santos, Pierre Sicard, Christian Sonne, Christopher M. Teaf, Aristidis Tsatsakis, Wenjie Wang, Eddy Y. Zeng, Edward J. Calabrese

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceExxonMobil FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLibrary scienceGeographyForestryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentFrench-language works237,207