MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combining LDM and MIMO for Mixed Broadcast-Broadband Service Delivery in 5G

2022· article· en· W4287847190 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Xue, Yuxiao Zhai, E.S. Sousa, Wei Li, Liang Zhang, Zhihong Hong, Yiyan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultimedia Broadcast Multicast ServiceComputer scienceBroadbandSingle-frequency networkBroadband networksComputer networkBroadcasting (networking)MIMOMultiplexingBeamformingService (business)Antenna (radio)TelecommunicationsTransmission (telecommunications)Multicast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates that by incorporating Layered Division Multiplexing (LDM) in 5G NR, we can create a two-layer network that can simultaneously deliver single frequency network broadcast service as well as a near full capacity broadband service. It is beneficial to transmit both layers on the same antennas following the same specifications to reduce system complexity and implementation cost. However, the narrow beams used in 5G broadband communications are not suitable for broadcast services which require continuous seamless coverage in the entire service area. This paper shows it is viable to perform beamforming and broadcasting at the same time. In addition, simulation results prove that using a 5G antenna and following 5G broadband specifications, an embedded SFN broadcast network can offer sufficiently high SINR to support high-definition video services, while providing narrow beam point-to-point communication services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)Same topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207