MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287980522 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.05.009

Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Vulvodynia Pain Scores

2022· article· en· W4287980522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D Phipps, E Southworth, K Welch, E Carey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVulvodyniaMcGill Pain QuestionnaireMedicineSexual abusePhysical therapyVisual analogue scalePoison controlInjury preventionPelvic painSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Vulvodynia is a chronic vulvar pain disorder that has a significant impact on physical and mental health. As with other chronic pain disorders, vulvodynia appears to have a link with childhood exposure to physical and sexual abuse and poor family support. Objective To assess the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and vulvodynia pain scores using the standardized McGill Pain Scale. Methods This study is a retrospective review of intake questionnaire data for patients presenting to a multispecialty vulvar diseases clinic. Demographic information, ACEs-related questions and McGill pain scale portions of the intake questionnaire were included. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, cancer diagnosis, or presenting postoperatively in initial consultation. A control group was randomly selected using 2:1 age-matching from patients within our database without a coexisting diagnosis of vulvodynia. The primary outcome, McGill pain score, was calculated as the sum across all 20 pain elements. Group differences across demographic characteristics, ACE responses, and McGill scores were assessed using simple linear regressions for continuous measures, and logistic regressions for binary measures. Results A total of 1,245 patients, 415 vulvodynia and 830 age-matched controls were analyzed. Patients with vulvodynia differed significantly across self-reported race/ethnicity, marital status, and income level. Overall, patients with a diagnosis of vulvodynia had higher median McGill pain scores compared to controls (22.0 vs 20.0, p<0.001). Among patients with vulvodynia, patients who reported ACEs exposure had higher McGill pain scores compared to patients without disclosed ACEs exposure (26.0 vs 22.0, p<0.001). Similarly, among patients in the control group, patients who reported ACE exposure had higher McGill pain scores compared to those without (24.0 vs 17.0, p<0.001). Conclusions Our findings indicate a relationship between exposure to ACEs and increased pain in patients with vulvodynia and controls. These findings suggest exposure to ACEs alone may contribute to increased perception of pain and result in higher McGill Pain Scores. Disclosure No

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207