Atomically Isolated Nickel–Nitrogen–Carbon Electrocatalysts Derived by the Utilization of Mg<sup>2+</sup> ions as Spacers in Bimetallic Ni/Mg–Metal–Organic Framework Precursors for Boosting the Electroreduction of CO<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2R) is a promising avenue for the conversion of CO2 into fuels and beneficial chemicals. Significant efforts have been devoted to the development of active and selective electrocatalysts for CO2R. Atomically dispersed transition metal electrocatalysts have recently attracted consideration for CO2R due to their unique electronic and structural properties that can impart good catalytic performance and high active metal utilization. Among different precursors used for preparing these catalysts, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been utilized as templates for generating atomically dispersed transition metal active sites as they provide well-defined structures that contain transition metals isolated from each other by organic ligands, along with high surface areas. However, maintaining the isolation of the transition metal species, achieving high surface concentrations of active sites, and imparting porosity during the high-temperature heat treatment of MOFs used during synthesis remain a challenge. In this report, Mg2+ ions have been employed as spacers in a bimetallic metal–organic framework (NiMg-MOF-74) to assist in preventing the coalescence of the Ni atoms into Ni-based particles during heat treatment, which combined with the use of urea as a nitrogen source resulted in the formation of isolated Ni–Nx/C active sites. Our findings demonstrated that Mg2+ ions play a crucial role in extending the distance between the adjacent Ni sites in the precursor structure and generating atomically isolated Ni sites. On the contrary, the utilization of Mg-free Ni-MOF-74 led to the formation of metallic Ni particles embedded in a carbon nanotube-based structure. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of pyrolysis temperature on the produced catalyst morphology. The generation of isolated Ni–Nx/C sites was promoted at higher pyrolysis temperatures (900 °C), while Ni-based particles were predominantly formed at a lower temperature (700 °C). The optimized atomically dispersed Ni–N–C catalyst exhibited excellent selectivity toward CO with a Faradaic efficiency of ∼90% and a current density of −4.2 mA/cm2 at −0.76 V vs a reversible hydrogen electrode.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".