Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo pretende aclarar la diferencia entre los conceptos de promoción de la salud (PS) y de educación para la salud (ES). A veces, se usan esos términos indistintamente y otras se usan como conceptos diferentes. El objetivo de este trabajo es una descripción general teórica para intentar mejorar nuestra comprensión de estos términos. Planteamos y analizamos los cinco principios de la PS de la OMS organizados en tres áreas: (a) la protección de la salud, (b) educación para la salud, y (c) prevención de la mala salud. Analizamos la ES dentro de la PS y la PS misma ligada a la salud pública. Señalamos los temas principales de la promoción de la salud: estilos de vida y cambios ambientales, analizamos la función de la PS y la ES, consideramos los diferentes modelos de PS, y ámbitos de la PS en la comunidad. Finalmente señalamos los horizontes actuales de la PS y la ES, insistiendo en que la PS debería ceñirse a los principios de la Carta de Ottawa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".