Status-Aware Signed Heterogeneous Network Embedding With Graph Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many real-world applications are inherently modeled as signed heterogeneous networks or graphs with positive and negative links. Signed graph embedding embeds rich structural and semantic information of a signed graph into low-dimensional node representations. Existing methods usually exploit social structural balance theory to capture the semantics of the complex structure in a signed graph. These methods either omit the node features or may discard the direction information of the links. To address these issues, we propose a new framework, called a status-aware graph neural network (S-GNN), to boost the representation learning performance. S-GNN is equipped with a loss function designed based on status theory, a social-psychological theory specifically developed for directed signed graphs. Extensive experimental results on benchmarking datasets verified that S-GNN can distill comprehensive information ingrained in a signed graph in the embedding space. Specifically, S-GNN achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, robustness, and scalability: it speeds up the processing time of link sign prediction by up to$6.5 \times $and increases accuracy by up to 18.8% as compared with the alternatives. We also show that S-GNN can obtain effective status scores of nodes for link sign prediction and node ranking tasks, both of which yield state-of-the-art performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".