Low Infection Rate for Hand Fractures Managed with Surgical Fixation under Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia with No Tourniquet in Minor Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the rate and type of infectious complications after surgical fixation of hand fractures managed under wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) in minor procedure rooms outside the main operating room. METHODS: A two-surgeon retrospective chart review was performed of patients who received surgical fixation of hand fractures under WALANT in minor surgery from March of 2014 to March of 2019. RESULTS A TOTAL OF: patients, with distal phalanx ( n = 16), middle phalanx ( n = 7), proximal phalanx ( n = 11), or metacarpal ( n = 26) fractures, were included in the study. The average patient age was 37 years, with a higher proportion of male patients (51:7). Two patients had two fractures each. Thirty of the 58 cases were already open fractures. Fixation was performed using either plates and screws (25 of 58) or nonburied Kirschner wires (31 of 58). Thirty-six percent of patients (21 of 58) were treated with prophylactic antibiotics. One patient developed postoperative cellulitis. The only case of osteomyelitis occurred in a patient with risk factors known to increase rates of infectious complications (open fracture, smoking history, and >24 hours from injury to treatment). No infectious complications occurred in those who sustained closed fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Although the minor surgery environment varies significantly from that of the main operating room, infection rates after surgical fixation of hand fractures using WALANT in this setting remain low (3.4 percent), with no documented infections in fractures that were referred closed and opened surgically for operative fixation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".