Transverse permeability in <i>Eucalyptus nitens</i> wood specimens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Permeability functionalities are noticeable in the wood drying and impregnation processes because it has an effect on the bulk flow of a fluid through the wood structure. The aim of this work was to measure the radial and tangential specific gas permeability of Eucalyptus nitens wood for 10 different provenances. Furthermore, the effect of the radial position (defined as inner-wood, middle-wood, and outer-wood) on the measurements was investigated. The specific gas permeability of E. nitens ranged in order of magnitude from 10−20 to 10−16 m2. The results showed that the radial position had a statistically significant effect on the specific permeability in both flow directions and, in general, the permeability values increased from inner-wood to outer-wood. Moreover, the scanning electron microscopy images showed obstruction of vessels by tyloses which explained the lower permeability values obtained in the inner-wood of E. nitens. Differences in the magnitude of the permeability values could explain the diverse drying and impregnation behavior according to the wood zones, the low permeability values in the internal wood-zone could suggest an opportunity for improving it, through chemical modification or structural changes to introduce new functionalities of this radial wood-zone in Eucalyptus nitens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".