MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288075450 · doi:10.33087/jiubj.v22i1.1681

Perbedaan Rerata Tekanan Darah pada Penderita Hipertensi Derajat I (Satu) Wanita Usia Reproduktif dengan Pemberian Jus Wortel (Daucus Carota L) di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tigo Baleh Kota Bukittinggi

2022· article· en· W4288075450 on OpenAlexaff
Kartika Mariyona, Pagdya Haninda Nusantri Rusdi, Lastri Oktari Tanjung

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureMedicineLower blood pressureAnesthesiaTraditional medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertension is a condition without symptoms, where abnormally high blood pressure in the arteries causes an increased risk of stroke, aneurysm, heart failure, heart attack and kidney damage and an increase in systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg. the main cause of hypertension in Indonesia, this disease is a very common intervention a person will say hypertension if he has systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and diatolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, systolic blood pressure is the main measurement which is the basis for determining hypertension. This research was conducted in the Tigo Baleh Health Center in Bukittinggi City. The research design was Quasi experiment sample of 10 people with hypertension (I) of reproductive age women using two groups of pre-test and post-test subjects were divided into 2 groups, control and intervention groups . The intervention group was given 200 grams of carrot juice which was processed into juice for 5 consecutive days of data analysis using a t-dependent statistical test. Average pre-test blood pressure 147 / 90.0 mmHg (control) and 141 / 84.5 mmHg (intervention), and post-test average blood pressure 146 / 89.4 mmHg (control) and 130/80 6 mmHg (intervention). Difference in average blood pressure before and after administration of carrot juice is 1.32 / 0.68 mmHg (control) and 10.6 / 3.96 mmHg (intervention). The results of the statistical test found that there was an effect of carrot juice administration on changes in blood pressure in patients with first-degree hypertension in women of reproductive age where the p-value was 0.09 / 0.43. The conclusion of this study is that the administration of carrot juice can reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension degree I (one) women of reproductive age, henceforth it is recommended for patients with hypertension to use carrot juice as an alternative non-pharmacological treatment..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari JambiSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207