MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288084738 · doi:10.1061/9780784484289.021

Maximizing Your Investment: An Incremental Approach to Assessment of Critical Large Diameter Transmission Mains

2022· article· en· W4288084738 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Donnally, Ken Seelig

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsAmerican Water (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMains electricityPipeline (software)Reliability engineeringReliability (semiconductor)Pipeline transportProcess (computing)Investment (military)Computer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)EngineeringRisk analysis (engineering)TelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringBusinessMechanical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When New Jersey American Water (NJAW) experienced three failures on one of their major transmission mains, they faced the challenge of how to effectively and efficiently spend their budget to maximize the remaining life one of the backbones to their conveyance system. Recognizing that while the pipeline had previously failed, it may still have significant remaining useful life, NJAW embarked on a phased, incremental approach to assess the condition of the pipeline and ultimately make necessary improvements to the main, while maximizing the value of their investment. One of the most significant challenges was to determine if the pipe had a few isolated problem locations or if uniform deterioration existed, which caused the three failures. The flexible approach was structured to optimize the collection of pertinent data by using collection methods of increasing levels of resolution, such that once an adequate level of information had been collected, the process could be halted, and necessary repairs and improvements could be made. The intent was to develop a proven, repeatable process that could be used to assess all of their high-risk transmission mains. This paper will discuss the phased approach used by NJAW to confirm reliability of this pipeline for years to come.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2022Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207