MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288095797 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01069

Fast Interpolation-based Globality Certificates for Computing Kreiss\n Constants and the Distance to Uncontrollability

2019· preprint· en· W4288095797 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Timothy J. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesYork UniversityCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)MathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsVariable (mathematics)Convergence (economics)Function (biology)State (computer science)AlgorithmConstant (computer programming)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new approach to computing global minimizers of singular value\nfunctions in two real variables. Specifically, we present new algorithms to\ncompute the Kreiss constant of a matrix and the distance to uncontrollability\nof a linear control system, both to arbitrary accuracy. Previous\nstate-of-the-art methods for these two quantities rely on 2D level-set tests\nthat are based on solving large eigenvalue problems. Consequently, these\nmethods are costly, i.e., $\\mathcal{O}(n^6)$ work using dense eigensolvers, and\noften multiple tests are needed before convergence. Divide-and-conquer\ntechniques have been proposed that reduce the work complexity to\n$\\mathcal{O}(n^4)$ on average and $\\mathcal{O}(n^5)$ in the worst case, but\nthese variants are nevertheless still very expensive and can be numerically\nunreliable. In contrast, our new interpolation-based globality certificates\nperform level-set tests by building interpolant approximations to certain\none-variable continuous functions that are both relatively cheap and\nnumerically robust to evaluate. Our new approach has a $\\mathcal{O}(kn^3)$ work\ncomplexity and uses $\\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ memory, where $k$ is the number of\nfunction evaluations necessary to build the interpolants. Not only is this\ninterpolation process mostly "embarrassingly parallel," but also low-fidelity\napproximations typically suffice for all but the final interpolant, which must\nbe built to high accuracy. Even without taking advantage of the aforementioned\nparallelism, $k$ is sufficiently small that our new approach is generally\norders of magnitude faster than the previous state-of-the-art.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207