MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288433410 · doi:10.1503/cjs.013821

Research and surgical residency: moving beyond one-and-done projects and motivating for scholarly excellence

2022· article· en· W4288433410 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Matthew G.K. Benesch, Alexander Mathieson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMentorshipMedicineExcellenceMedical educationValue (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized insulin protocol in reducing glycemia, review 18F-FDG biodistribution with such a protocol, and assess its clinical impact. Methods: Sixty-three patients with glycemia greater than 10 mmol/L received insulin doses intravenously according to a standardized protocol. One hundred six consecutive euglycemic patients (<6.2 mmol/L) served as controls. 18F-FDG biodistribution was evaluated by 2 experienced PET readers on a 5-point visual scale based on muscular uptake. The 63 patients who received insulin were divided into insulin subgroup A, with adequate biodistribution (score 0, 1, or 2) and insulin subgroup B, with altered biodistribution (score 3 or 4). 18F-FDG biodistribution was also evaluated semiquantitatively by standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements over the liver, gluteal muscles, and myocardium. Clinical impact (complications and diagnostic accuracy) was assessed by follow-up. Results: Glycemia decreased from 13 ± 2 to 7 ± 2 mmol/L after insulin injection. Images showed significantly more muscular uptake in patients who received insulin than in the control group (scores 1.6 ± 1.5 vs. 0.4 ± 0.6, P < 0.05). Twenty-five percent of insulin patients studied had altered biodistribution (insulin subgroup B). The two most important factors increasing muscular uptake were the time interval between insulin and 18F-FDG injection (mean in insulin subgroup A, 80.2 ± 17 min; mean in insulin subgroup B, 65.7 ± 10 min; P < 0.01) and the glycemia interval decrease after insulin injection (mean in insulin subgroup A, 5.3 ± 2.6 mmol/L; mean in insulin subgroup B, 7.6 ± 1.8 mmol/L; P < 0.01). In insulin subgroup B, mean hepatic SUV was lower (1.3 ± 0.4 vs. 2.1 ± 0.4, P < 0.01) and mean muscular SUV was higher (1.8 ± 0.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.01, P < 0.01). Of the 63 patients who received insulin, 6 had hypoglycemia, but only 2 were symptomatic. No patient had severe complications causing permanent disability. Conclusion: A standardized protocol of intravenous insulin before 18F-FDG injection in diabetic cancer patients was safe and effective in reducing glycemia. Acceptable 18F-FDG biodistribution was obtained in 75% of patients receiving insulin. In addition to visually increased muscular uptake, low hepatic 18F-FDG uptake was a good indicator of altered biodistribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.392
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.032 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207