At Least 5-Year Outcomes of Whiplash-Induced Chronic Neck Pain Following Response to Intra-Articular Facet Joint Corticosteroid Injection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the response to intra-articular facet joint corticosteroid injection can determine the long-term prognosis (at least 5 years after injury) of whiplash injury-related neck pain sustained 3-12 months after injury. Methods: Of 65 patients who visited a university hospital for persistent whiplash injury-induced axial neck pain sustained 3-12 months after injury (numeric rating scale score ≥3) and had received intra-articular facet joint corticosteroid injection, 40 completed the telephone interview. We divided the patients into "good response group" (≥50% pain reduction at 1 month after the injection) and "poor response group" (<50% pain reduction at 1 month after the injection). We asked participants regarding the presence and degree of neck pain, its impact on work, and the use of oral pain medication or injection treatment. Results: A follow-up at least 5 years after the injury found that the number of patients with persistent whiplash injury-related neck pain was significantly lower in the good response group than in the poor response group. The number of patients taking oral pain medications prescribed by a medical doctor or receiving injection treatments in a pain clinic or hospital for neck pain was lower in the good response group than in the poor response group. The number of patients who answered that their work was affected by neck pain was lower in the good response group than in the poor response group. Conclusion: The response to intra-articular corticosteroid injection might be helpful in determining at least 5-year outcomes of chronic whiplash injury-induced pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".