El Edipo en la obra de Maurice Merleau-Ponty: notas para el estudio fenomenológico de la infancia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo será analizar la lectura que Merleau-Ponty hace del complejo de Edipo, para identificar, a partir de allí, el recorrido metodológico que el filósofo francés realiza en el estudio fenomenológico de un periodo clave de la infancia. El polimorfismo infantil, la raigambre histórica de los lugares instituidos en una comunidad, el enfoque histórico y dialéctico del desarrollo, y la premaduración serán algunos de los rasgos a partir de los cuales Merleau-Ponty analiza el Edipo. Considero que la descripción que Merleau-Ponty realiza de este complejo junto con la crítica a la concepción universalista del psicoanálisis presentan en sí mismas un enfoque fenomenológico del desarrollo, del que se desprenden, por un lado, lineamientos teóricos relevantes para el estudio situado, corporal y no reduccionista de la experiencia infantil y, por otro, una redefinición del sujeto y del esquema corporal en términos eminentemente intersubjetivos Abstract The aim of this work will be to analyze the reading that Merleau-Ponty makes of the Oedipus complex, to identify, thereof, the path that the French philosopher makes in the phenomenological study of a key period of childhood. Infantile polymorphism, the historical roots of the places established in a community, the historical and dialectical approach to development, and pre-maturation will be some of the features from which Merleau-Ponty analyzes the Oedipus Complex. I consider that the description that Merleau-Ponty makes of this complex together with the critique of the universalist conception of psychoanalysis present in themselves a phenomenological approach to development, from which they emerge; on the one hand, relevant theoretical guidelines for the situated, bodily, and non-reductionist study of infantile experience and, on the other, a redefinition of the subject and the body schema in eminently intersubjective terms. Palabras clave Merleau-Ponty, complejo de Edipo, desarrollo, infancia. Keywords Merleau-Ponty, Oedipus complex, development, childhood. Referencias Bégout, B. (2004). Esquisse d’une théorie phénoménologique de l’habitude. Alter Revue de Phénoménologie, 12, 173-190. Bourdieu, P. (2000). La dominación masculina. Barcelona, España: Anagrama. Buffone, J. (2019). La construcción del esquema corporal infantil desde una perspectiva merleaupontyana: la propiocepción como fundamento del accouplement fenomenológico. Arete, 31(2), 297-320. Buffone, J. (en prensa). Maurice Merleau-Ponty and the personal institution. Oedipus complex and the opening to new ways of sociability. Metis. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Fenomenología. Duportail, G. F. (2013). Cuerpo, amor, nominación. Lacan y Merleau-Ponty (Trads. A. Kripper y L. Lutereau). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Letra Viva. Freud, S. (2011). Tótem y tabú. Madrid, España: Alianza. Freud, S. (2015). Tres ensayos sobre la teoría sexual y otros escritos. Madrid, España: Alianza. Gléonec A. (2017). Institution et passivité. Lectures de Merleau-Ponty. París, Francia: Million. Lacan, J. (2017). Seminario 5. Las formaciones del inconsciente. Madrid, España: Paidós. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signos (Trads. C. Martínez y G. Oliver). Barcelona, España: Seix Barral. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1976). La estructura del comportamiento (Trad. E. Alonso). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Hachette. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1984). Fenomenología de la percepción (Trad. J. Cabanes). Barcelona, España: Planeta-Agostini (original en francés, 1945). Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). La nature. Notes du Collège de France. París, Francia: Éditions de Seuil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".