MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4288691911 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1889559/v1

Abnormal regional homogeneity (ReHo) in Congenital Amusia: a resting-state functional MRI study

2022· preprint· en· W4288691911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ru Yang, Feng Hou, Junjie Sun, Xuan Liao, Zhishuai Jin, Daxing Wu, Jun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersXiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAudiologyResting state fMRIFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Congenital amusia (CA) is a disorder of pitch perception, a core function of the human auditory system. A total of seventeen amusics, fitting stringent criteria in Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA), and fourteen healthy controls participated in our study. Here, we aimed to characterize a local resting state functional measure, regional homogeneity (ReHo) to evaluate abnormal local consistency of the neurons spontaneous activity in CA group compared with the healthy control group. We focused on potential brain areas with significant differences between the two groups. The partial correlation analyses applied to ReHo values as well as scores of MBEA subtests. The CA group showed a significant decrease ReHo values in the left postcentral gyrus and left middle cingulum cortex when compared to controls. The ReHo values of those two significant regions were both positively correlated with MBEA scores. All in all, this study identified brain regions which were not discussed previously that may partly contribute to or be modulated by CA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicNeuroscience and Music Perception→French-language works237,207→