Travel-associated extensively drug-resistant typhoid fever: a case series to inform management in non-endemic regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) typhoid fever is a threat to travelers to Pakistan. We describe a multicontinental case series of travel-acquired XDR typhoid fever to demonstrate the global spread of the problem and encourage preventive interventions as well as appropriate empiric antimicrobial use. METHODS: Cases were extracted from the GeoSentinel database, microbiologic laboratory records of two large hospitals in Toronto, Canada, and by invitation to TropNet sites. All isolates were confirmed XDR Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Salmonella typhi), with resistance to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. RESULTS: Seventeen cases were identified in Canada (10), USA (2), Spain (2), Italy (1), Australia (1) and Norway (1). Patients under 18 years represented 71% (12/17) of cases, and all patients travelled to Pakistan to visit friends or relatives. Only one patient is known to have been vaccinated. Predominant symptoms were fever, abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhoea. Antimicrobial therapy was started on Day 1 of presentation in 75% (12/16) of patients, and transition to a carbapenem or azithromycin occurred a median of 2 days after blood culture was drawn. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were consistent with the XDR S. typhi phenotype, and whole genome sequencing on three isolates confirmed their belonging to the XDR variant of the H58 clade. CONCLUSIONS: XDR typhoid fever is a particular risk for travelers to Pakistan, and empiric use of a carbapenem or azithromycin should be considered. Pre-travel typhoid vaccination and counseling are necessary and urgent interventions, especially for visiting friends and relatives travelers. Ongoing sentinel surveillance of XDR typhoid fever is needed to understand changing epidemiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".