MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288796554 · doi:10.26443/msurj.v15i1.15

Clinical Manifestations of Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Case Report

2020· article· en· W4288796554 on OpenAlexaff
Jude Balit, Aanya Bhagrath, Marina Nysten, Farida Rahman, Joyce Y. Wu, Kejin Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFumaraseLeiomyomatosisMedicinePathologyRenal cell carcinomaMissense mutationGene mutationGermline mutationBirt–Hogg–Dubé syndromeCarcinomaMutationLeiomyomaBiologyGeneticsGeneRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) is a rare genetic disorder etiologically stemming from mutations in the FH gene. This disorder has been reported in 300 families worldwide. We were presented with the following case as part of the Rare Disease Interdepartmental Science Case Competition (RISCC) in order to successfully diagnose the patient and examine the pathophysiology, socioeconomics, and treatment strategy of this disorder.Case Presentation: A 27-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with a two-week history of hematuria. Her medical history included a single benign skin lesion. She did not report a family history of cancer but stated that her mother underwent a hysterectomy for unknown reasons.Clinical Investigations: An abdominal ultrasound revealed an isoechoic nodular formation on the right kidney, and CT scans confirmed the presence of a 7-cm renal tumour and extensive leiomyomas in the patient’s uterus. Genetic testing revealed a mutation in the fumarate hydratase (FH) gene, leading to the diagnosis of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma.Pathophysiology: HLRCC is a condition caused by an autosomal dominant germline mutation in the FH gene, characterized by skin lesions, uterine leiomyomas, and aggressive renal cell carcinoma. FH acts as a tumour suppressor gene and encodes the fumarase protein. HLRCC arises from a variety of missense mutations in the FH gene that prevent the formation of a full fumarase tetramer. The disease is likely related to the dosage of the gene, rather than the site of mutation. Consequently, there is no known genotype/phenotype correlation. Fumarate inhibits HIF-α hydroxylases, so loss of the FH gene causes fumarate accumulation within cells and prevents the degradation of HIF-α. This induces a state of pseudohypoxia and leads to upregulation of genes involved in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Fumarate accumulation also modulates the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway by inducing activation of Nrf2 and allows for the protection of cancer cells from oxidative and electrophilic stressors. Furthermore, deficiency of fumarase prevents oxidative phosphorylation, thus promoting aerobic glycolysis, the most common method of metabolism used by cancer cells.Socioeconomics: The risk of infertility and developing an aggressive cancer makes it essential to have frequent and thorough screening procedures early in life for children with a family history of HLRCC. Medical costs, infertility risk, and frequent hospital visits breed anxiety and stress for patients and family members. Fortunately, organizations like HLRCC Family Alliance exist to provide accessible information and represent a welcoming support community.Treatment Strategy: To treat the patient’s renal tumour, we suggest a radical nephrectomy with wide margins due to the aggressive nature of renal cell carcinoma. Additional imaging should be performed to identify and excise any metastatic tumours. The patient should also consult a gynecologist regarding her extensive uterine leiomyomas and will likely undergo a hysterectomy or myomectomy. A full dermatological exam should be performed to locate additional cutaneous leiomyomas. We also strongly suggest that family members undergo genetic testing. Lastly, we recommend the patient connect with support groups such as HLRCC Family Alliance to receive continued social support following her diagnosis and throughout her life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research JournalSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207