A Social Media Website (Supporting Our Valued Adolescents) to Support Treatment Uptake for Adolescents With Depression or Anxiety: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescents with depression or anxiety initiate mental health treatment in low numbers. Supporting Our Valued Adolescents (SOVA) is a peer support website intervention for adolescents seen in primary care settings and their parents with the goal of increasing treatment uptake through changing negative health beliefs, enhancing knowledge, offering peer emotional support, and increasing parent-adolescent communication about mental health. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aimed to refine recruitment and retention strategies, refine document intervention fidelity, and explore changes in study outcomes (the primary outcome being treatment uptake). METHODS: We conducted a 2-group, single-blind, pilot randomized controlled trial in a single adolescent medicine clinic. Participants were aged 12 to 19 years with clinician-identified symptoms of depression or anxiety for which a health care provider recommended treatment. The patient and parent, if interested, were randomized to receive the SOVA websites and enhanced usual care (EUC) compared with EUC alone. Baseline, 6-week, and 3-month measures were collected using a web-based self-report survey and blinded electronic health record review. The main pilot outcomes assessed were the feasibility of recruitment and retention strategies. Implementation outcomes, intervention fidelity, missingness, and adequacy of safety protocols were documented. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize mental health service use and target measures with 2-sample t tests to compare differences between arms. RESULTS: Less than half of the adolescents who were offered patient education material (195/461, 42.2%) were referred by their clinician to the study. Of 146 adolescents meeting the inclusion criteria, 38 completed the baseline survey, qualifying them for randomization, and 25 (66%, 95% CI 51%-81%) completed the 6-week measures. There was limited engagement in the treatment arm, with 45% (5/11) of adolescents who completed 6-week measures reporting accessing SOVA, and most of those who did not access cited forgetting as the reason. Changes were found in target factors at 6 weeks but not in per-protocol analyses. At 12 weeks, 83% (15/18) of adolescents randomized to SOVA received mental health treatment as compared with 50% (10/20) of adolescents randomized to EUC (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot trial of a peer support website intervention for adolescents with depression or anxiety, we found lower-than-expected study enrollment after recruitment. Although generalizability may be enhanced by not requiring parental permission for adolescent participation in the trials of mental health interventions, this may limit study recruitment and retention. We found that implementing education introducing the study into provider workflow was feasible and acceptable, resulting in almost 500 study referrals. Finally, although not the primary outcome, we found a signal for greater uptake of mental health treatment in the arm using the SOVA intervention than in the usual care arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03318666; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03318666. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/12117.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".