Parameters estimation and fatigue life prediction of sisal fibre reinforced foam concrete
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the Glivenko-Cantelli theorem and Weibull distribution functions, the fatigue life of foam concrete with different sisal fibre volume fraction (0–0.3% vol.) was performed. When the two-parameter Weibull function was selected, a linear regression analysis showed that the fatigue life had high correlation between the independent and dependent variables (correlation coefficients above 0.75). But the three-parameter Weibull analysis gave more accurate results (correlation coefficients above 0.90). Then, the corresponding Weibull probability density function distributions of the fatigue lives were compared. Based on the parameters obtained, the fatigue lives of foam concrete with different survival probabilities were analyzed and compared with results taken from the literature. Finally, for specific survival probabilities, the fatigue limit and fatigue life of foam concrete under specified stress level were predicted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it