Association Between Weight Gain and the Incidence of Cardiometabolic Conditions Among People Living with HIV-1 at High Risk of Weight Gain Initiated on Antiretroviral Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been associated with weight gain in people living with HIV-1 (PLWH); however, limited research has assessed whether early weight gain post-ART initiation is associated with metabolic or cardiovascular outcomes among PLWH at high risk of weight gain (i.e., female, Black or Hispanic). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes between PLWH at high risk of weight gain following an observed ≥ 5% or < 5% weight/body mass index (BMI) gain within 6 months following ART initiation. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study using Symphony Health, an ICON plc Company, IDV® electronic medical records (October 1, 2014-March 31, 2021) identified adult female, Black, or Hispanic treatment-naïve PLWH who initiated ART and who had ≥ 1 weight or BMI measurement pre- and within 6 months post-treatment (landmark period). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for differences between PLWH who experienced ≥ 5% and < 5% weight/BMI gain. The time to each outcome was compared between cohorts using weighted hazard ratios (HRs) after the landmark period. RESULTS: Weighted ≥ 5% and < 5% cohorts included 620 and 632 patients, respectively; baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts (mean age: ~ 48 years, ~ 59% female, ~ 49% Black, ~ 17% Hispanic). During a mean 2-year follow-up, PLWH with ≥ 5% weight/BMI gain were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; HR = 2.19; p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in the incidence of any other outcomes between the study cohorts. CONCLUSION: Despite a short 2-year follow-up, female, Black or Hispanic PLWH experiencing ≥ 5% weight/BMI increase within 6 months following ART initiation had an increased risk of T2DM, but not other metabolic or cardiovascular outcomes, likely due to the short follow-up period. Further research with longer follow-up and specific ART regimens is warranted to examine the impact of ART-related weight gain on long-term clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".