MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289523825 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.948448

Characterization of colonization kinetics and virulence potential of Salmonella Enteritidis in chickens by photonic detection

2022· article· en· W4289523825 on OpenAlexafffund
Dinesh H. Wellawa, Po-King S. Lam, Aaron P. White, Brenda Allan, Wolfgang Köster

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersInnovation SaskatchewanChicken Farmers of SaskatchewanAlberta Agriculture and ForestryMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologyVirulenceMicrobiologySalmonella enteritidisSalmonellaCecumOperonYolkColonizationMutantBacteriaGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The light emitting module lux operon ( luxCDABE ) of Photorhabdus luminescens can be integrated into a “dark” bacterium for expression under a suitable promoter. The technique has been used to monitor kinetics of infection, e.g., by studying gene expression in Salmonella using mouse models in vivo and ex vivo . Here, we applied the bioluminescence imaging (BLI) technique to track Salmonella Enteritidis (SEn) strains carrying the lux operon expressed under a constitutive promoter sequence (sigma 70) in chicken after oral challenge. Detectable photon signals were localized in the crop, small intestine, cecum, and yolk sac in orally gavaged birds. The level of colonization was determined by quantification of signal intensity and SEn prevalence in the cecum and yolk sac. Furthermore, an isogenic SEn mutant strain tagged with the lux operon allowed for us to assess virulence determinants regarding their role in colonization of the cecum and yolk sac. Interestingly, mutations of SPI-1 (Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1) and fur (ferric uptake regulator) showed significantly decreased colonization in yolk sac that was correlated with the BLI data. A similar trend was detected in a Δ tonB strain by analyzing enrichment culture data. The inherently low quantum yield, light scattering, and absorption by tissues did not facilitate detection of signals from live birds. However, the detection limit of lux operon has the potential to be improved by resonance energy transfer to a secondary molecule. As a proof-of-concept, we were able to show that sensitization of a fluorescent-bound molecule known as the lumazine protein (LumP) improved the limit of detection to a certain extent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207