MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289528286 · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2022.07.016

Long-term open-label extension study of the safety and efficacy of intrathecal idursulfase-IT in patients with neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II

2022· article· en· W4289528286 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Muenzer, Barbara K. Burton, Paul Harmatz, Luis González Gutiérrez-Solana, Matilde Ruíz-Garcìa, Simon Jones, Nathalie Guffon, Michal Inbar‐Feigenberg, Drago Bratkovic, Michael Hale, Yuna Wu, Karen S. Yee, David Whiteman, David Alexanderian

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNYU Grossman School of MedicineSanofi GenzymeNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchREGENXBIOBioMarin PharmaceuticalAlexion PharmaceuticalsCleveland ClinicDenali TherapeuticsGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceUltragenyx PharmaceuticalChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaSanofi
KeywordsHunter syndromeAdverse effectMedicineEnzyme replacement therapyClinical endpointMucopolysaccharidosis type IIPediatricsRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enzyme replacement therapy with weekly infused intravenous (IV) idursulfase is effective in treating somatic symptoms of mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome). A formulation of idursulfase for intrathecal administration (idursulfase-IT) is under investigation for the treatment of neuronopathic MPS II. Here, we report 36-month data from the open-label extension (NCT02412787) of a phase 2/3, randomized, controlled study (HGT-HIT-094; NCT02055118) that assessed the safety and efficacy of monthly idursulfase-IT 10 mg in addition to weekly IV idursulfase on cognitive function in children older than 3 years with MPS II and mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment. Participants were also enrolled in this extension from a linked non-randomized sub-study of children younger than 3 years at the start of idursulfase-IT therapy. The extension safety population comprised 56 patients who received idursulfase-IT 10 mg once a month (or age-adjusted dose for sub-study patients) plus IV idursulfase (0.5 mg/kg) once a week. Idursulfase-IT was generally well tolerated over the cumulative treatment period of up to 36 months. Overall, 25.0% of patients had at least one adverse event (AE) related to idursulfase-IT; most treatment-emergent AEs were mild in severity. Of serious AEs (reported by 76.8% patients), none were considered related to idursulfase-IT treatment. There were no deaths or discontinuations owing to AEs. Secondary efficacy analyses (in patients younger than 6 years at phase 2/3 study baseline; n = 40) indicated a trend for improved Differential Ability Scale-II (DAS-II) General Conceptual Ability (GCA) scores in the early idursulfase-IT versus delayed idursulfase-IT group (treatment difference over 36 months from phase 2/3 study baseline: least-squares mean, 6.8 [90% confidence interval: -2.1, 15.8; p = 0.2064]). Post hoc analyses of DAS-II GCA scores by genotype revealed a clinically meaningful treatment effect in patients younger than 6 years with missense variants of the iduronate-2-sulfatase gene (IDS) (least-squares mean [standard error] treatment difference over 36 months, 12.3 [7.24]). These long-term data further suggest the benefits of idursulfase-IT in the treatment of neurocognitive dysfunction in some patients with MPS II. After many years of extensive review and regulatory discussions, the data were found to be insufficient to meet the evidentiary standard to support regulatory filings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Genetics and MetabolismSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207