MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289532308 · doi:10.18280/ejee.240305

A Photovoltaic System Controlled by the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Supplied a Shunt Active Power Filter

2022· article· en· W4289532308 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Khelil Cherfi, Abderrezak Gacemi, Abdelkader Morsli, Abdelhalim Tlemçani

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Electrical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsPhotovoltaic systemTotal harmonic distortionOverheating (electricity)Particle swarm optimizationPower factorControl theory (sociology)Maximum power point trackingElectronic engineeringInverterComputer scienceAC powerRobustness (evolution)EngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distortion of the currents caused by non linear loads gives rise to harmonics that shorten the life of the devices and damage the electrical grid, causing malfunctions and overheating. The distortion of the currents caused by non linear loads gives rise to harmonics that shorten the life of the devices and damage the electrical grid, causing malfunctions and overheating. Mitigation of harmonics problems and reactive power compensation are necessary in order to improve the Total Harmonic Distortion and increase the power factor. The Shunt Active Power Filter (SAPF) reduces harmonics and greatly improves the sinusoidal shape of the current. This paper presents an application of the photovoltaic system that envelops photovoltaic energy source and DC-DC boost converter, for the control of the latter, we used the MPPT technique based on the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to supply a two-level inverter applied to a SAPF based on three phases connected to the grid. The obtained results obtained with MATLAB/Simulink show clearly a good performance of the SAPF with the integration of the proposed work. Again, these results are compatible with those required by the electrical network and which follow the international standard recommendation IEEE-519 1992.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Electrical EngineeringSame topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207