MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289536358 · doi:10.5455/ijmrcr.172-1646367058

Predictors of early visual outcome after endoscopic trans sphenoidal excision of pituitary adenomas

2022· article· en· W4289536358 on OpenAlexaff
Akhil Mohan, Rajeev Mandakaparambil, Prakasan Kannoth, Pavithran Muriyil, J Byjo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePituitary adenomaVisual acuitySurgeryVisual fieldAdenomaContext (archaeology)Prospective cohort studyPituitary neoplasmTranssphenoidal surgeryOphthalmologyPituitary glandInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transsphenoidal excision has revolutionized the surgical management of pituitary macroadenoma. There had been several retrospective studies on the factors determining the visual outcome after surgical excision of pituitary adenoma, but very few prospective studies were published in this context. This is a prospective study of the factors predicting visual outcome following endoscopic transsphenoidal excision of pituitary adenoma. Various factors like age, duration of visual symptoms, the volume of the tumour, suprasellar extension, parasellar extension, type of adenoma, pituitary apoplexy, completion of excision, fundoscopic changes, and preoperative visual deficits were studied. METHODS: Single centre prospective observational study done between November 2016 to December 2018. Thirty patients with pituitary macroadenoma who underwent trans nasal endoscopic excision were studied with preoperative and postoperative visual impairment score (VIS) and the visual outcome was categorized as a good outcome if there was more than 5% improvement in VIS and as worse otherwise. Various predictors that may influence the outcome were statistically compared. RESULTS: 83.3% of patients (n=25) showed improvement in their vision at 6months follow-up. Overall visual outcome (considering both parameters visual acuity and visual field together) was dependent on suprasellar extension (P=0.01), completion of excision (P=0.004), and primary optic atrophy (P=0.018). On subgroup analysis recovery in visual acuity was significantly determined by the preoperative tumour volume(P=0.041), suprasellar extension (P=0.006), completion of excision(P=0.003), and primary optic atrophy (P=0.013). The improvement in the field of vision depended on the severity of preoperative field defects (P=0.04) and completion of excision (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The factors predicting the early visual outcome were the suprasellar extension, completion of excision, preoperative field deficits, and primary optic atrophy. This study highlights the importance of early and proper intervention in pituitary adenomas managed surgically to procure the desired result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Medical Reviews and Case ReportsSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207