PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND FRAGILITY LEVELS in ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the physical activity and fragility levels of elderly individuals. This study was conducted between October 4, 2021, and December 4, 2021, with 216 elderly individuals in descriptive and cross-sectional type. "Individual Over 65 Descriptive Information Form", "Edmonton Vulnerability Scale" and "International Physical Activity Questionnaire" were used as data collection forms. Data were collected through face-to-face interview. Data analysis was done in SPSS 25.0 package program. A p<0.05 value was accepted for statistical significance. The mean age of the elderly individuals was 71.56±6.10 years, 54.6% were female, 72.2% were married, and 40.3% were primary school graduates. It was determined that 42.1% of the elderly individuals were not frail, and the mean frailty score was 5.41±2.59. It was determined that 52.8% of the individuals performed moderate physical activity in the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Average Scores, and they performed the most walking activity among the total physical activity. In addition, a statistically significant difference was found between gender, educational status, marital status, having a chronic disease, and frailty. A statistically significant difference was found between physical activity level and marital status, educational status and living with family members. Elderly individuals were found to have varying degrees of fragility and to do moderate physical activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".