MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4289654072 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.02.22278344

Acute respiratory distress syndrome and shunt detection with bubble studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4289654072 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jeffrey Odenbach, Sumeet Dhanoa, Meghan Sebastianski, Lazar Milovanovic, Andrea M. Robinson, Graham D. Mah, Oleksa Rewa, Sean M. Bagshaw, Brian Buchanan, Vincent Lau

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineARDSShunt (medical)Cochrane LibraryMeta-analysisInternal medicineSystematic reviewMEDLINELung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objectives Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening respiratory injury with multiple physiological sequalae. Shunting of deoxygenated blood through intra and extra-pulmonary shunts is one consequence that may complicate ARDS management. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of sonographically detected shunt and its association with oxygenation and mortality in patients with ARDS. Data Sources We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and DARE databases on March 26, 2021 Study Selection Articles relating to respiratory failure and sonographic shunt detection. Data Extraction Articles were independently screened and extracted in duplicate. Data pertaining to study demographics and shunt detection were compiled for mortality and oxygenation outcomes. Risk of bias was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tools with evidence rating certainty using GRADE methodology. Data Synthesis From 4,617 citations, 10 observational studies met eligibility criteria. Sonographic detection of right-to-left shunt was present in 21.8% of patients (range:14.4-30.0%) amongst included studies using transthoracic, transesophageal and transcranial bubble Doppler sonography. Shunt prevalence may be associated with increased mortality (risk ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.49, p=0.04, very low certainty evidence) with no difference in oxygenation as measured by P a O 2 :FiO 2 ratio (mean difference -0.7, 95% CI: -18.6 to 17.2, p=0.94, very low certainty evidence). Conclusions Intra- and extra-pulmonary shunts are detected frequently in ARDS with ultrasound techniques. Shunts may increase mortality amongst patients with ARDS, but its association with oxygenation is uncertain. Future research should explore the role of shunt in ARDS, their association with mortality, and whether targeted precision medicine interventions can improve outcomes. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021245194 (March 26, 2021) Key Points Question: In adult critically ill ARDS patients, what is the prevalence of right-to-left shunts, and what are their effects on mortality and/or oxygenation? Findings: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, shunts be may prevalent in ∼1 in 5 ARDS patients. They may be associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality, with no difference in oxygenation parameters. Meaning: Intra- and extra-pulmonary shunts are detected frequently in ARDS with ultrasound techniques, and may increase mortality amongst patients with ARDS (although its association with oxygenation is uncertain).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.031
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→