MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling Network Contagion Via Interacting Finite Memory Pólya Urns

2022· article· en· W4289655131 on OpenAlexaff
Somya Singh, Fady Alajaji, Bahman Gharesifard

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chainMathematicsAperiodic graphHomogeneousMarkov processCombinatoricsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct a system of interacting finite memory Pólya urns to model contagion spread in a network. The urns, which are composed of red and black balls (representing degrees of infection and healthiness, respectively) interact in the sense that the probability at any time instant of drawing a red ball for a given urn not only depends on that urn’s ratio of red balls, but also on the ratio of red balls in the other urns of the network, hence accounting for the effect of spatial contagion. The urns have a finite memory, M, in the sense that reinforcing (black or red) balls added to each urn at time t are only kept in that urn for M future time instants (until time t + M). The resulting vector of all urn drawing variables forms an Mth order time-invariant irreducible and aperiodic Markov chain. We analytically examine the properties of the underlying Markov process and derive its asymptotic behaviour for the case of homogeneous system parameters. We further use mean-field approximation to obtain a class of approximating linear and nonlinear dynamical systems for the non-homogeneous case. Finally, we present simulations to assess the quality of these mean-field approximations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207