MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289755092 · doi:10.1186/s13023-022-02409-3

Incidence of thrombotic microangiopathies in Quebec: insight from a laboratory centralizing ADAMTS-13 testing

2022· article· en· W4289755092 on OpenAlexaffabout
Clémence Merlen, Emmanuelle Pépin, Ousmane Barry, Anik Cormier, Caroline Dubois, Anne‐Laure Lapeyraque, Stéphan Troyanov, Georges‐Étienne Rivard, Arnaud Bonnefoy

Bibliographic record

VenueOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersAlexion PharmaceuticalsSanofi GenzymeSanofi
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)ADAMTSMedicineIntensive care medicineImmunologyInternal medicineMetalloproteinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are serious medical conditions requiring a prompt diagnosis to adapt treatment. The determination of ADAMTS-13 activity enables discriminating thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from other forms of TMA. The purpose of this study was to provide an estimate of the incidence of TTP and TMA in the Canadian Quebec province using data collected from a laboratory centralizing ADAMTS-13 testing for the whole province. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019, 846 patients were evaluated for plasma ADAMTS-13 activity due to a suspicion of TMA. TTP was identified in 147 patients. Of these, 118 patients with a median age of 51.5 years and a male-female ratio of 1:1.4 had their first episode of TTP during the study period. The number of ADAMTS-13 tests performed and the number of patients with suspected TMA increased annually by 19% and 21% respectively. While the incidence of non-TTP TMA increased annually, that for TTP remained unchanged. This averaged 10.2 (95% CI 5.9-14.4) per million persons per year for suspected non-TTP TMA and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.4) for confirmed TTP. The incidence rate of TMA other than TTP was higher in the age group 70-79 years (21.8; 95% CI 5.4-38.1) for females and in the age group 80-89 years (24.4; 95% CI 7.2-41.7) for males compared to other age groups. The incidence rate of TTP was higher in the age group 40-49 years (4.0; 95% CI 2.0-5.9) for women and in the age group 60-69 years (3.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.6) for men compared to other age groups. CONCLUSION: The analysis of centralized data measuring ADAMTS-13 activity allowed us to adequately establish the incidence rate and demographic characteristics of TMA, particularly TTP, in Quebec. TTP incidence remained stable while suspected non-TTP TMA steadily increased from 2012 to 2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrphanet Journal of Rare DiseasesSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207