Geometric Clutter Analysis for Airborne Passive Coherent Location Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents detailed geometric analyses of ground clutter in bistatic passive airborne radars. Analytic closed-form solutions are derived for finding the intersection of iso-ranges and iso-velocities. This allows clutter bistatic coordinates to be easily converted to its Cartesian coordinates. Based on those solutions, a theoretical clutter map in the bistatic coordinates can be calculated assuming uniform clutter distribution on the Earth’s surface. This is done by first converting a resolution cell in the bistatic coordinates into a corresponding cell in the Cartesian coordinates. Next, the power distribution in the bistatic coordinates is calculated taking into account range dependency, incident angles, and the radiation patterns of the transmitter and the receiver. The aim of this analysis is to characterize clutter in terms of expected mean power map rather than in terms of statistical distribution. The obtained results provide insight into the expected characteristics of clutter, which can be helpful in designing signal processing algorithms for ground moving target indication (GMTI) and synthetic aperture radar (SAR). The theoretical clutter distribution on the range-velocity map is compared with real-life data acquired with a DVB-T-based passive radar, and good agreement between theory and measurement is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".