MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289812600 · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108858

Clinical MRI morphological analysis of functional seizures compared to seizure-naïve and psychiatric controls

2022· article· en· W4289812600 on OpenAlexaff
Wesley T. Kerr, Hiroyuki Tatekawa, John K. Lee, Amir H. Karimi, Siddhika S. Sreenivasan, Joseph O’Neill, Jena M. Smith, L. Brian Hickman, Ivanka Savic, Nilab Nasrullah, Randall Espinoza, Katherine L. Narr, Noriko Salamon, Nicholas J. Beimer, Lubomir M. Hadjiiski, Dawn Eliashiv, William C. Stacey, Jerome Engel, Jamie D. Feusner, John M. Stern

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsy & Behavior · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institutes of HealthW. M. Keck Foundation
KeywordsWhite matterEpilepsyPsychologyNeuroimagingAnxietyPsychogenic diseaseDepression (economics)Magnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineMedicinePsychiatryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

a b s t r a c tPurpose: Functional seizures (FS), also known as psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), are physical manifestations of acute or chronic psychological distress.Functional and structural neuroimaging have identified objective signs of this disorder.We evaluated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphometry differed between patients with FS and clinically relevant comparison populations.Methods: Quality-screened clinical-grade MRIs were acquired from 666 patients from 2006 to 2020.Morphometric features were quantified with FreeSurfer v6.Mixed-effects linear regression compared the volume, thickness, and surface area within 201 regions-of-interest for 90 patients with FS, compared to seizure-naïve patients with depression (n = 243), anxiety (n = 68), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD, n = 41), respectively, and to other seizure-naïve controls with similar quality MRIs, accounting for the influence of multiple confounds including depression and anxiety based on chart review.These comparison populations were obtained through review of clinical records plus research studies obtained on similar scanners.Results: After Bonferroni-Holm correction, patients with FS compared with seizure-naïve controls exhibited thinner bilateral superior temporal cortex (left 0.053 mm, p = 0.014; right 0.071 mm, p = 0.00006), thicker left lateral occipital cortex (0.052 mm, p = 0.0035), and greater left cerebellar white-matter volume (1085 mm 3 , p = 0.0065).These findings were not accounted for by lower MRI quality in patients with FS.Conclusions: These results reinforce prior indications of structural neuroimaging correlates of FS and, in particular, distinguish brain morphology in FS from that in depression, anxiety, and OCD.Future work may entail comparisons with other psychiatric disorders including bipolar and schizophrenia, as well as exploration of brain structural heterogeneity within FS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsy & BehaviorSame topicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207