Rehabilitation of patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rehabilitation has an important place in the treatment and management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Currently, active research is being carried out in the field of telerehabilitation, extended rehabilitation and staged rehabilitation. Objective: to study the results of staged motor rehabilitation, which is a combination of methods of inpatient rehabilitation, telerehabilitation and home rehabilitation, as links in a chain to maintain rehabilitation potential for a longer period and, if possible, maintain the level of physical activity and quality of life of patients. Patients and methods. The study included 53 patients with progressive forms of MS, who were divided into the main (n=28) and control (n=25) groups. Intensive rehabilitation was carried out, supplemented by telerehabilitation and home rehabilitation. The condition of all patients was assessed using validated scales: the Beck questionnaire, the suicide scale, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 Questionnaire (MsQol-54), the Rankin scale, the Rivermead mobility index, the Barthel index. Physical activity tests were performed – Berg's balance test, 25-foot and 6-minute walk test, five squats, nine-hole peg tests. Cognitive functions were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Results and discussion. Statistically significant improvement 12 weeks after the end of intensive rehabilitation was noted in the nine-hole peg test, the five squats test, the Berg balance test, the Rivermead mobility index, and the pain level on the visual analog scale. Conclusion. The obtained results suggest that the staged rehabilitation of patients with progressive forms of MS helps to maintain the rehabilitation potential for a long time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".