Investigating the Longterm Biomass Yield of Miscanthus Giganteus and Switchgrass when Harvested as a Green Energy Feedstock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent research has indicated that the leading perennial energy grasses, Miscanthus giganteus and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) may be utilized for non-thermal energy conversion. The feedstock requirements for these conversion technologies would allow the crops to be harvested early, prior to senescence, to exploit the greater higher biomass yields that occur during the autumn. Miscanthus grown at three locations in Europe was continually harvested early and maintained its high peak yield when compared to the conventional spring post-senescence yield. At one site, where the crop was continually harvested for 6 years, the early harvest yield began to decline after four years although this yield decline did not occur when the crop was adequately supplied with additional nitrogen. The two ecoptypes of switchgrass grown at locations in Europe, responded very differently to an early harvest. Lowland switchgrass at two locations could not maintain the high peak yield even with a moderate application of nitrogen. Upland switchgrass examined at one location did sustain high peak yields for 5 years of continuous early harvest without the need for additional nitrogen. The results of this study have indicated that a continual early harvest of both miscanthus and switchgrass is possible but replacement plant nutrients must be applied to the crop to revent or limit the extent of any yield decline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".