MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289933889 · doi:10.2118/208962-pa

A Machine Learning Approach to Real-Time Uncertainty Assessment of SAGD Forecasts

2022· article· en· W4289933889 on OpenAlexaff
Seyide Hunyinbo, Prince N. Azom, Amos Ben‐Zvi, Juliana Y. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCenovus Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReservoir simulationMonte Carlo methodUncertainty quantificationData miningField (mathematics)Bayesian probabilityWorkflowMachine learningArtificial intelligencePetroleum engineeringEngineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Field development planning and economic analysis require reliable forecasting of bitumen production. Forecasting at the field level may be done using reservoir simulations, type curve analysis, and other (semi-)analytical techniques. Performing reservoir simulation is usually computationally expensive, and the nonuniqueness of a history-matched solution leads to uncertainty in the model predictions and production forecasts. Analytical proxies, such as Butler’s model and its various improvements, allow for sensitivity studies on input parameters and forecasting under multiple operational scenarios and geostatistical realizations to be conducted rather quickly, despite being less accurate than reservoir simulation. Similar to their reservoir simulation counterparts, proxy models can also be tuned or updated as more data are obtained. Type curves also facilitate efficient reservoir performance prediction; however, in practice, the performance of many steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) well pairs tends to deviate from a set of predefined type curves. Historical well data is a digital asset that can be utilized to develop machine learning (ML) or data-driven models for production forecasting. These models involve lower computational effort than numerical simulators and can offer better accuracy compared to proxy models based on Butler’s equation. Furthermore, these data-driven models can be used for automated optimization, quantification of geological uncertainties, and “What If” scenario analysis due to their lower computational cost. This paper presents a novel ML workflow that includes a predictive model development using the random forest algorithm, clustering (to group well pairs by geological properties), Bayesian updating, and Monte Carlo sampling (for uncertainty quatification) for the forecasting of real-world SAGD injection and production data. The training data set consists of field data from 152 well pairs, including approximately 3 years of operational data. Each well pair’s data set involves data that are typically available for an SAGD well pair (e.g., operational data, geological, and well design parameters). This ML workflow can update predictions in real time and be applied for quantifying the uncertainties associated with the forecasts, making it an important step for development planning. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first time ML algorithms have been applied to an SAGD field data set of this size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207